|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 法官对贺绍强夫妇的极其负面评价（希望北美华人从中汲取教训） |
 |
安魂曲
[个人文集]
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 12787
经验值: 0
|
|
|
作者：安魂曲 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
（安魂曲评：显然在北美主流社会看来，一个人如果又聪明又有决心，但偏偏就是经常撒谎（华人常有的毛病）。。。。那么你这个人就属于will do and say anything in order to achieve their desired goals这类人，从而在北美法庭彻底失去信誉。
所以奉劝所有的北美华人：千万不要试图用自己的小聪明来打北美官司，那样的结果，往往比一个对打官司半通不通、经常犯低级无知错误的人更糟----这次贺绍强夫妇在打官司问题上，大量听取了岳东晓等“聪明”中国帮手的意见建议，同时违反法庭规定，借他人之笔大量在法庭外进行煽动宣传。。。结果自己从头到尾一直感觉出奇良好，偏偏没有察觉法庭已经对他们“熟悉、利用互联网”的一些小动作十分反感，虽不好直接惩处，但却借评论贺家夫妇的机会好好剖析讥讽了一番他们。）
Mr. He is highly educated, both in the Peoples Republic of China and in the United States, and exhibits a high level of intelligence. He has demonstrated that he also has a high level of knowledge of the culture in the United States, that he is familiar with the justice system in Shelby County, Tennessee, and that he is proficient in his knowledge and use of the English language. He is proficient in computer skills, including the ability to access the Internet and to use website technology to garner resources and seek assistance from experts. He has an aggressive personality and shows no propensity to be deterred or intimidated. He is a thoughtful and deliberate person who exhibits a proclivity to calculate, plan, and carefully predetermine his action and behaviors. At all times relevant to this case, Mr. He has demonstrated the ability to access knowledgeable advisors in any area in which he needs assistance, to scrutinize the advice given, and, if dissatisfied with the advice, reject the advice and seek out other advisors.
_ Since 1998, Mr. He has repeatedly engaged in a pattern of conduct marked by deceitfulness and dishonesty, without remorse, repentance, or conscience, and has shown a propensity to justify all means, including perjury, for what Mr. He deems to be justifiable ends.
_ Mr. He admitted that he lied about his income, under oath, in his December 20, 2001, deposition and that he said things that he knew were not the truth. During his deposition, Mr. He also knowingly and willfully gave false testimony with respect to material facts concerning his and Mrs. He’s assets. The Court has previously found that Mr. He committed perjury while under oath in Court hearings and pleadings filed in this cause.
_ The Court reaffirms and incorporates herein by reference the findings made by the Court relative to the perjury of Mr. He in testimony given before the Court on February 14, 2002, as memorialized in the February 22, 2002, order entitled “Judgment On Order To Show Cause Pertaining To Passport” and the order entitled “Judgment On Order To Show Cause Pertaining To Documentation Of Marriage In The Republic Of China.”
_ The evidence also shows that Mr. He tried to procure an F-2 visa, in 1997, for another Chinese woman, who Mr. He claimed was his wife. Mr. He later admitted that this woman was not his wife and that he had committed a fraud on the University of Memphis.
_ Mr. He made material false statements on a loan application, dated October 18, 2001, relative to his employment, his income, his status as a student, and his personal references for the purpose of securing a loan for the purchase of a new vehicle.
_ Mr. He first entered the United States on a F-1 Student visa which allowed him to be employed and earn income. However, after he was suspended by the University of Memphis on September 20, 1999, and his student visa was revoked, Mr. He was not legally permitted to be employed and earn income in the United States. Nevertheless, Mr. He has been employed and earned income in the United States, since September 20, 1999, and has failed to report his income to the Internal Revenue Service, thus defrauding the United States government.
_ Mrs. He is an impetuous person not subject to being intimidated or deterred in achieving whatever she sets as her goal. The evidence shows that she is calculating, almost theatrical, in her actions. The evidence further shows that she is dishonest and manipulative, and has a history of acting in an unstable manner when it serves her own self-interest. For example, during cross-examination, Mrs. He would begin sobbing when asked difficult questions. However, Mrs. He would immediately regain her composure when asked subsequent questions. It appears to the Court that Mrs. He’s courtroom hysterics were calculated by Mrs. He in an effort to avoid answering the difficult cross-examination questions.
_ Though Mrs. He speaks sufficient English to carry on her daily affairs in the United States, she is not as proficient as Mr. He in knowledge or use of the English language and, unlike Mr. He, sometimes needs assistance with translation in technical or extraordinary use of the English language. She has confidence in Mr. He, prefers Mr. He as her translator, has no desire to part company with Mr. He for any reason and intends to cooperate fully with Mr. He to remain together with him as a family and believes Mr. He has never failed to keep her fully and honestly informed about the legal matters involving AMH.
_ Although Mrs. He does not speak the English language fluently, she appears to speak and understand English better than she professes. For example, Mrs. He spoke English during some of the Hes’ visits with AMH at the Bakers’ home and when Mrs. He took the Hes’ other children for medical treatment. She also spoke English during the incident when she was holding a sign outside of the Bakers’ home, and the Bakers’ neighbor, Rebecca Smith, asked Mrs. He to move her car, and she spoke English during the December 2003, incident at the Wal-Mart store. During the trial, in response to a question from attorney Linda Holmes, Mrs. He responded to the question by speaking in English, before the interpreter had begun interpreting Ms. Holmes’ question to Mrs. He. Mrs. He said, “Mr. Parrish filed legal motion,” then she stopped speaking English and began responding to the question in Chinese.
_ Mrs. He admitted signing a document in the Peoples Republic of China that falsely stated that she and Mr. He were married for the purpose of obtaining a visa allowing her to come to the United States.
_ Although the Hes were not married at the time, Mrs. He entered the United States illegally, in 1998, on a F-2 visa, as the wife of a person in the United States on a student visa, despite the fact that she indicated that she was single, not married, on AMH’s birth certificate.
_ Because of her status as an illegal alien, Mrs. He was not legally permitted to be employed and earn income. Nevertheless, Mrs. He has been employed and earned income in the United States throughout most of her stay, but has failed to report her income to the Internal Revenue Service, thus defrauding the United States government.
_ Mrs. He only seems to be interested in regaining custody of AMH when deportation seems imminent. This fact is evidenced by Mrs. He filing the two (2) petitions to modify custody in close proximity to receiving calls from the United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (“INS”), regarding Mr. and Mrs. Hes’ immigration status.
_ From the totality of the credible proof at trial, both Mr. and Mrs. He have shown themselves to be persons who do not consider themselves to be bound by the rule of law. Mr. and Mrs. He have demonstrated that they will do and say anything in order to achieve their desired goals.
作者：安魂曲 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
