海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: To:铁木----美国某准将JOHN S. BROWN 笔下的上甘岭
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 To:铁木----美国某准将JOHN S. BROWN 笔下的上甘岭   
搬运工
[个人文集]






加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 576

经验值: 0


文章标题: To:铁木----美国某准将JOHN S. BROWN 笔下的上甘岭 (843 reads)      时间: 2002-10-05 周六, 上午11:12

作者:搬运工罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

找了半天,终于把原来贴的东西给翻出来了。





美国某准将JOHN S. BROWN 笔下的上甘岭

文章来源: 搬运工 于 2002-8-25 13:19:00:







他承认联合国军(含美军及韩国军队)伤亡人数是9000

而统计我军伤亡是19000人,同我军自己统计的1.56万相去不远。不过我们统计在上甘岭歼敌25400多人,同9000这个数字比... ...





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



22



easy, holding them would not be. The Chinese reacted violently to the American initiative, and by the end of June the 45th Division had repulsed more than twenty Communist counterattacks on the newly established positions. Still the enemy came, and in mid-July his persistence paid off when Chinese troops succeeded in pushing elements of the 2d Infantry Division off one of these outposts-a key mountain nine miles west of Ch'orwon known as Old Baldy. Two companies from the 23d Infantry recaptured the hill after bitter hand-to-hand fighting on 1 August, but in mid-September the enemy again seized the hill, only to lose it several days later to a determined counterattack made by the 38th Infantry and a platoon of tanks.



The savage, seesaw struggle atop Old Baldy was repeated in one way or another on countless mountain peaks and ridges during 1952, as the two sides struggled to gain ascendancy over the rugged no-man's-land that separated their respective battle lines. The heavy casualties incurred in these bitter outpost battles discouraged General Clark from authorizing any new offensives after Operation Counter. This defensive-mindedness rankled General Van Fleet, who believed that the high casualties the United Nations was experiencing were due in part to the UN's allowing the enemy to launch attacks when and where he wished. Van Fleet therefore pressed Clark to authorize additional limited offensives that would allow UN forces to regain the initiative from the enemy and compel him to fight on American terms.



One potential candidate for such an operation was Triangle Hill, a mountain three miles north of Kumhwa. The United Nations was suffering heavy casualties in the area on account of the proximity of the opposing battle lines, which in some cases lay only 200 yards apart. Seizing Triangle Hill and its neighbor-Sniper Ridge-would force the enemy to fall back over 1,200 yards to the next viable defensive position, thereby strengthening UN dominance over the sector and reducing friendly casualties. Finally, an offensive would also serve a political purpose. On 8 October UN negotiators had walked out of the armistice talks out of frustration over being unable to reach an accommodation with the enemy on the prisoner issue. With the talks now officially recessed and no hope in sight for a resolution of the conflict, a demonstration of UN resolve seemed in order. Van Fleet was confident that, given sufficient support, two infantry battalions would be able to capture the Triangle Hill complex in just five days with about 200 casualties. Swayed by Van Fleet's arguments, Clark agreed to authorize the attack.



On 14 October, 280 artillery pieces and over 200 fighter-bomber sorties began pummeling Triangle Hill. Unfortunately, Communist



23







Soldiers of Battery C, 936th Field Artillery Battalion, fire at Communist positions near Ch'orwon: below, artillery may have dominated the battlefield, but ultimately it was infantry that captured and held ground. Here, Company F, 9th Infantry, advances in central Korea. (National Archives)







24



defenses proved tougher than expected, and reinforcements had to be funneled in-first one battalion, then another, and another. When the smoke finally cleared several weeks later, two UN infantry divisions (the U.S. 7th and the ROK 2d) had suffered over 9,000 casualties in an ultimately futile attempt to capture Triangle Hill. Estimates of Chinese casualties exceeded 19,000 men, but the Communists had the manpower for such fights and did not flinch from flinging men into the breach to hold key terrain. The United Nations did not have such resources.





所有跟贴:

瞧,有色眼镜导致你更相信美国人的数据。你有什么佐证吗?-美国人没有撒谎?(0 bytes ) (7 readers)2002-8-25

说明什么?我看到是美国的战术意图彻底失败。伤亡大就不打仗了?-都跟美国佬跪着好了!(0 bytes ) (14 readers)2002-8-25





作者:搬运工罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 搬运工离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.055338 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]