海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 哲学,是贫困还是富饶?(四)
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 驴鸣镇
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 哲学,是贫困还是富饶?(四)   
所跟贴 哲学,是贫困还是富饶?(四) -- 芦笛 - (5665 Byte) 2010-5-12 周三, 上午8:35 (744 reads)
断章师爷
[个人文集]






加入时间: 2009/08/25
文章: 615

经验值: 27036


文章标题: Mathematical fetishism (134 reads)      时间: 2010-5-12 周三, 上午11:14

作者:断章师爷驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

Mathematicians derive aesthetic pleasure from their work, and from mathematics in general. Sometimes mathematicians describe mathematics as an art form or, at a minimum, as a creative activity. Comparisons are often made with music and poetry.

Mathematicians tend to see beauty in mathematical results which establish connections between two areas of mathematics which at first sight appear to be totally independent. A good example of this is Euler's identity, called "the most remarkable formula in mathematics" by Feynman, for relating all the critical constants (0, 1, e, i, pi) and operations (equality, addition/subtraction, multiplication/division, and exponentation/roots) in a neat formula. This is widely recognized to have a property that mathematics professors often describe as beautiful, elegant or important.

Such results may be obtained by clever, unconventional or innovative means, but these three terms are not used interchangeably, and not every mathematical result is described in these terms. Just as often, results or calculations are called ugly, clumsy, pedestrian, conversely, such results are usually correct, but are obtained by laborious, conventional, or even kludgy means.

The statement that a specific mathematical result is beautiful is rarely seen in published mathematical research, but this is a result of the modern emphasis on impersonality. Classic mathematical works from as late as the 19th century are often written in a very personal style and contain grandiose statements which the modern reader would classify as anything from quaint to preposterous, or in any case more appropriate to writing popularizations. This is true of most scientific writing. It is also true of most bad writing. Whether this style is reasonably a form of literature or theology is quite difficult to say.

In ancient ages famous mathematicians such as Pythagoras (and his entire philosophical school) believed in the literal reality of numbers. Indeed, the discovery of irrational numbers was a great shock for them - they considered the existence of numbers not expressable as the ratio of two natural numbers to be a terrible flaw in nature. Indeed, from the modern perspective Pythagoras was as much a numerologist as a mathematician, and his treatment of numbers was more like that of a religious believer than of a modern mathematician - including his dealing with heresy: he reputedly drowned a student in a barrel for revealing irrational numbers.

Another example is Archimedes, who was so impressed by one of his own theorems that he asked that a representation of it be used as his epitaph. He is also reputed to have been killed by a soldier for ignoring him to concentrate on diagrams he was drawing with a stick in the sand.

About the relationship between art and mathematics, one may say that ancient Egyptians and Greeks knew the golden ratio, regarded as an aesthetically pleasing ratio, often used when building monuments (e.g., the Parthenon). The pentagram so popular among the Pythagoreans also contains the golden mean. Recent studies showed that the Golden ratio plays a role in human perception of beauty, as in body shapes and faces. Johannes Kepler believed that the regular solids (tetrahedron, cube, dodecahedron) were important to the organizing of the Solar System before finding the even-more-elegant solution of the elliptical orbit. So it is hard to say that beliefs of this sort play no role in science or should not be in philosophy of science.

Ludwig Boltzmann and Carl Friedrich Gauss also requested that their most famous theorems be used as an epitaph, in the forms of Boltzmann's equation and a 17-sided polygon, respectively. This is more clearly like a religion.

作者:断章师爷驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 断章师爷离线  发送站内短信
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 驴鸣镇 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    可以在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.184596 seconds ] :: [ 28 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]