|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 电影《疯狂的石头》是一株大毒草 |
 |
dck
加入时间: 2004/04/02
文章: 2801
经验值: 4649
|
|
|
作者：dck 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
电影《疯狂的石头》是一株宣扬自由主义的大毒草
电影《疯狂的石头》上演了，很多人都叫好，认为是中国电影的希望。在杂谈上看到很多评论以后，忍不住去租了一张影碟来看。没想到该片是如此不堪，简直令人发指。毛主席在1951年发表的《应当重视电影武训传的讨论》中指出 “电影《武训传》的出现，特别是对于武训和电影《武训传》的歌颂竟至如此之多，说明了我国文化界的思想混乱达到了何等的程度!”，那么今天可以说，《疯狂的石头》的出现以及热捧，同样反映出了当前电影界乃至整个文化界思想的混乱。
可以毫不夸张的说，电影《疯狂的石头》是一株宣扬自由主义的大毒草。
首先，《疯狂的石头》没有遵循毛主席在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话精神，没有做到文艺为政治服务。完全不知道影片在宣扬什么，歌颂什么。
电影中几乎看不到正面的东西，充斥着的是坑甍拐骗偷的内容。这样的片子如果在国际上放映将造成什么样的影响？如果我是一个港商看到麦克一出机场就被“蒙眼拎包”的骗术骗了，我还会来重庆投资吗？这将对重庆的招商引资将造成多么恶劣的影响。
更令人难以忍受的是电影中对国有企业的改革使用的否定的态度，借电影中包世宏之口对国有企业领导老谢大加指责，认为他“出卖了全厂工人”。同时还利用种种场景暗示国有企业工人的艰难，如三宝家的黑暗狭小，包世宏8个月未拿工资等等。而影片塑造的代表民营企业家形象的冯董就更加不堪，生活奢华糜烂，而且还有犯罪嫌疑，用他秘书的话“坐八辈子牢都够了”，最后竟然亲手动手杀人。影片给人总的感觉就是先富起来的民营企业家都是罪行累累的坏蛋，与国有企业的管理者勾结起来，借改革之名侵吞国有财产，压榨剥削工人。这不是对中央现行的改革方针的公然否定吗？真是其心可诛。
第二，影片没有遵循文艺战线 “三突出”的原则。影片的主人公包世宏是个一身缺点的人。他自以为是，而恰恰每次判断都失误。他当保卫科长，而贼可以把展厅当成“公共厕所”，想来就来。谢小盟拍了他两句马屁给了一包烟他就打开了玻璃柜，把宝石调了包他还蒙在谷里，后来又怀疑是三宝偷了宝石，可是又不报案，明显犯了受贿、渎职和包庇三个错误。最后和道哥的交锋中如果不是道哥阴差阳错的撞车，他只有眼睁睁地看着道哥逃走了。事后他又和三宝吹嘘“离老子二百米，老子就晓得是佳陵250”等等，后者连忙拍马屁“你的鸳鸯腿确实霸道”。电影中塑造的正面人物就是这种形象。而面对企业的改革，他竟然不讲政治，不顾大局，公开无理顶撞和指责领导，不知影片塑造出这个正面人物是什么居心。
总的来说，影片通片简直毫无可取之处，我们不是反对电影讽刺现实中存在的一些弊端，可是该片中这样恶搞确实让人难以接受。比如片中两次提到“文明执法”，本来是执法人员素质提高的好事，可是片中不从正面来反映，反而用讽刺的态度。一次是包世宏说不要讲文明执法，要带一包白灰。还一次是通过“棒棒”之口，来讽刺我人民城管的形象。真是让人气愤。
总之，电影《疯狂的石头》是一株宣扬自由主义的大毒草，希望广电总局尽快予以封杀。
[in translation]
The movie "Crazy Stone" is now being shown across China. Many people are heaping praises upon this movie and calling it the hope of Chinese cinema. After reading many magazine reviews of the movie, I went out and rented a disk to watch it. I did not imagine how wretched this movie was. It was enough to make me boil with anger. In 1951, Chairman Mao published "The Importance of the Discussion of the movie 'The Life of Wu Xun (武训传)'" and pointed out the appearance of the movie 'The Life of Wu Xun' (and the corresponding praises for the character of Wu Xun and the movie) demonstrated the chaotic state of Chinese cultural life! Today, the appearance of "Crazy Stone" and accompanying high praises also reflect the chaotic state of thinking in Chinese cinema and more generally in the cultural field as a whole.
It is no exaggeration to say that the movie "Crazy Stone" is a big poisonous weed that promotes liberalism.
First of all, "Crazy Stone" did not follow the spirit of Chairman Mao's speech at the Yenan Literature Forum because it failed to perform any political service on behalf of literature. I have no idea what this movie is promoting or praising.
There is practically nothing positive in the movie. There were just all sorts of con games being played by people. What will the repercussions be if this movie were to be shown internationally? If I were a Hong Kong businessman and I saw that Mark was conned by the "baggage trick" as soon as he stepped out of the airport, would I invest in Chongqing? This will have very bad consequences in terms of the ability of the city of Chongqing to attract foreign investments.
It is even more unbearable to watch the negative attitudes in the movie about the economic reforms in China. The movie used the words of the character Bao Shihong to accuse the state enterprise leader Old Xie of "selling out everybody at the factory." At the same time, it used many scenes to depict the hardship of the state enterprise workers. For example, Sanbao's home was dark and tiny, Bao Shihong had not received wages for eight months, etc. The movie's portrayal of the private entrepreneur Feng Dong was even more wretched. Feng lived an extravagant but rotten life with hints of criminal activities -- in the words of his secretary, "eight lifetime prison sentences won't be enough" and Feng actually killed someone with his own hands in the end. The movie conveyed the general impression that the private entrepreneurs who got rich before others were crooks who collude with the state enterprise managers to seize state property under the name of economic reform and to oppress and exploit the workers. Is this is not a public negation of the current economic direction of the central government? This is truly deplorable.
Secondly, the movie did not follow the principle of "Three Emphases" in the cultural line of thought. The principal character Bao Shihong is a flawed person. He thought that he was smart, but every judgment of his was wrong. When he was the security chief, the thieves could come and go to the exhibition hall as if it were a public restroom. Xie Xiaomeng flattered him and gave Bao a pack of cigarettes, and then Xie opened up the glass case and switched the stone without Bao being aware. Later on, Bao suspected that Sanbao had stolen the precious stone, but he did not report to the police. Clearly, he was guilty of three mistakes -- receiving a bribe, dereliction of duty and covering up a crime. Finally, in his battle with Daoge, if it were not for the fact that Daoge was involved in an automobile collision by chance, he would not have caught him. Afterwards, Bao boasted to Sanbao: "I could tell from 200 meters away that it was a Jialing 250" and so on, while the latter flattered him about his 'martial arts skill." Such was the positive character in the movie. In a movie about economic reform, he does not deal with politics and the overall situation. Instead, he openly and unreasonably deplored the leaders. I don't know what evil intentions are harbored through such a principal character in the movie.
Generally speaking, the movie has no redeeming values whatsoever. We are not opposed to movies being sarcastic about certain flaws in real life, but the spoofing in this movie made it really difficult to accept. For example, the movie mentioned the "civilized enforcement of the law" twice. Elevating the quality of law enforcement personnel should be a good thing, but the film did not deal with this positively. Instead it adopted a sarcastic attitude. On the first occasion, Bao Shihong said, 'Don't talk to me about civilized enforcement of the law. Bring a bag of lime instead." On the other occasion, a porter made fun of the image of our municipal administrators. This is really infuriating.
Overall, the movie "The Crazy Stone" is a big poisonous weed that promotes liberalism. We hope that the State Administration of Films, Radio and Television will ban it quickly.
作者：dck 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
