海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 用西方学者的论文专著剥下袁红冰反西方民族主义鼓吹者的丑恶真面目-----
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 用西方学者的论文专著剥下袁红冰反西方民族主义鼓吹者的丑恶真面目-----   
安魂曲
[个人文集]






加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 12787

经验值: 0


文章标题: 用西方学者的论文专著剥下袁红冰反西方民族主义鼓吹者的丑恶真面目----- (988 reads)      时间: 2006-9-02 周六, 上午4:13

作者:安魂曲罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

(安魂曲评:袁红冰自称自己曾积极参加了六四民主运动,可事实是:六四镇压还不到一年、北京仍处于白色恐怖之中的1990年5月,大陆官方的“现代出版社”就已经公开出版了他长达373页的个人专著《荒原风》----由此可见其如今自我吹嘘的所谓“因参加六四而受到大陆残酷迫害”的说法根本为假。

更有趣的是:袁红冰出版的这本《荒原风》,居然成为了90年代众多西方学者有关中国民族主义思潮问题论文和专著中的一个典型例证!----这并不是因为如今自称“自由民主战士”的袁红冰那本著作曾站在自由人权的立场旗帜鲜明地反对在大陆喧嚣一时的极端民族主义思潮,而恰恰是因为他的这本《荒原风》,是六四后大陆出现的第一部宣传狭隘反西方、反个人自由民族主义邪恶思想的重要出版物,其出台时间甚至远早于那本著名的《中国可以说不》。

如今,以“法轮民运”为代表的部分海内外“民运民主人士”,居然把这位充当大陆官方法学红人十多年,最近才抛弃妻子儿女偷渡澳洲、并马上摇身一变以“民运英雄”自居的袁红冰先生,当成了可以依靠来推翻中共实现民主的一个重要民运人物。。。可他们大概根本不知道:正是这位袁红冰先生,在六四镇压后的第二年,就居然主动投中共强硬派所好,在自己的著作中发表了大量反西方、反个人自由,宣传狭隘民族主义甚至极权主义的疯狂谬论!

看到袁红冰当年的那些疯狂言论,每个头脑没病的人都应该本能地警觉:这么一个丑恶无比的尼采式的反西方民族主义狂徒居然能在今天的中国民运中指点江山招摇过市,这究竟是为什么?!)


以下英文原文摘自Anti-Western Nationalism in China, 1989-99(中国的反西方民族主义)一文,该文作者Guangqiu Xu,发表于World Affairs 2001年春季刊(早在袁红冰出国前三年)。

“The first anti-Western book that appeared after the Tiananmen incident was Yuan Hongbing's, Huangyuan Feng (Winds over the Plain).(5) Yuan claimed that the Chinese race would survive in the modern world, condemning attempts to achieve freedom by fleeing China as a betrayal of the Chinese race. In addressing Western ideas and values, he criticized those who had tried to find Western solutions to Chinese problems. His book became popular with many college students in 1990.“

(5.) Yuan Hongbing, Huangyuan feng [Winds over the Plain] (Beijing: Xiandai chubanshe, 1990).

这段英文直译如下-----

天安门事件之后出现的第一部反西方书籍就是袁红冰的“荒原风“(注释5)。袁声称中华民族将在现代世界中生存下去,谴责那些企图通过逃离大陆而获取自由的人是对中华民族的出卖。在谈到西方思想和价值的时候,他批评了那些企图为中国问题寻找西式解决办法的人们。他的这本书获得了1990年很多大学生的欢迎。

注释5:袁红冰《荒原风》(北京现代出版社1990年版)

(以上文章可以在下面这个网址看到:http://www.findarticles.com/p/ar ... s_4_163/ai_78729185)


-----除了上面这篇文章之外,我使用Google对Yuan Hongbing和Nationalism进行组合搜索,居然搜出了大量的西方人论文,其中都拿袁红冰作为大陆极端民族主义思潮鼓吹者的最典型例子!

比如下面这篇:

TO SCREW FOREIGNERS IS PATRIOTIC: CHINA'S AVANT-GARDE NATIONALISTS (咒骂外国人就是爱国:中国的民族主义先锋们)

Geremie R. Barmé

里面有关袁红冰的内容如下:

Without public intellectuals or public debate, few of the more extreme opinions that do appear - for example, those of Yuan Hongbing in his 1990 Winds on the Plain (discussed below) or Wang Shan in his 1994 book China Through the Third Eye (19) - get challenged except by pro-Party propagandists。 在没有公共知识分子和公共辩论的情况下,那些最极端的言论,比如,袁红冰1990年出版的《荒原风》(下面有专门讨论),或者王山1994年出版的《第三只眼睛看中国》,都极少会受到除了官方声音之外的质疑。


Yuan Hongbing: Pissing in the Wind
袁红冰:荒原风


“This race that dwells on the continent of East Asia once shone with a brilliance bestowed by the sun. Now it has its back to the icy wall of history, driven there by the forces of Fate. We must prove whether we are an inferior race or not, for now Fate is pissing in our very faces. (62)“
(袁文摘录:生活在东亚大陆上的这个民族曾一度辉煌。由于命运的捉弄,它已经被尘封在历史的冰川中。我们必须证明我们是否一个劣等的种族,因为如今命运已经在我们的脸上撒尿了)


Today, radical views do not necessarily issue from pro-Maoist ideologues or conservatives. One firebrand is Yuan Hongbing, a lawyer formerly at Beijing University and labour organizer, whose involvement with a 'Peace Charter' reportedly modeled on the Czechoslovak 'Charter 77' (63) and detention in February 1994 put him in the front ranks of China's small public dissident movement, (64) although his philosophy is more akin to New Age Nietzscheanism than liberalism. (65)

(今天,种族主义观点已经不见得来自毛主义思想或保守派。一个著名的例子是袁红冰。。。)

Yuan was one of the organizers of the controversial publication Lishide chaoliu [The Tide of History] in 1992, noted for its anti-conservative, reformist tone. (66) Yet an earlier volume authored by Yuan entitled Winds on the Plain, which appeared in 1990, is perhaps more revealing of his mindset and that of some of his coevals. (67) Seen by some readers as a philosophical tract of considerable individuality, in the repressive intellectual atmosphere of post-Tiananmen China it soon gained a considerable following among university students. (6Cool

(。。。然而,袁1990年出版的《荒原风》一书却可能最深刻地揭示了他的思想和同类。。。。在天安门事件后反智气氛浓重的中国,该书很快在大学生中获得了共鸣)

In the book Yuan propounds what he calls 'new heroicism' ( xin yingxiong zhuyi), a cause that is primarily concerned with the 'fate of the race' and the strongman as national hero and saviour. (69) Like Nietzsche (a philosopher whose high standing among Chinese intellectuals has a long history), he talks of the need for madness and irrationality. (70) Yuan condemns all individual attempts to achieve freedom as a betrayal of the race, whether it be to engage in politics or to flee China in search of a new life. He condemns those who seek from the West a solution to China's problems. Indulging in what could be called 'Sino-fascism', (71) he proposes that the answer to the political, social and cultural 'ugliness' of the Chinese is purification through fire and blood: total warfare 'even if this creation means that our blue skies darken with the colour of blood that will not fade for a thousand years'.

(在该书中袁鼓吹他所谓的“新英雄主义“,一种主要考虑“民族前途“、宣传强人将成为国家英雄和救世主的理想。和尼采一样,他大谈特谈疯狂和反理性的必要。袁谴责所有那些争取个人自由的行动为对民族的出卖,不管它们是对政治的参与还是逃离中国去争取自由。他谴责那些寻求中国问题西式解决方案的人们。沉溺于“中华法西斯主义“的思想中,他主张解决中国政治、社会、文化“丑陋面“的答案是纯粹的血与火:全面的战争“如果这意味着我们的蓝天被一千年都不会消散的血云所染红的话“。)

In Yuan's vision, the first step toward national renewal is a 'totalitarian style' ( jiquande xingshi ). 'Only with totalitarianism will it be possible to fuse the weak, ignorant and selfish individuals of the race into a powerful whole'. The race needs strong, idealistic, dignified and free men to achieve this end. In his own formulation of the neo-authoritarian/conservatism debate that has developed in China since the late 1980s, (72) Yuan says that his soi-disant 'freedom fighter' must be crowned by a 'democracy' that he uses to break the nexus between totalitarian rule and authoritarianism. This hero must put the welfare of the race above all other concerns, including those of the family. (73) Indeed, race is an easy way of coping with the complex legacies of cultural superiority, political exclusivity and self-loathing that have been discussed. By emphasizing race, the question of humanity is happily circumvented, as are all of the knotty problems of political, social and personal morality and ethics that are germaine to it. (74)

(在袁的书中,国家复兴的第一步是“极权的行使“。”只有极权主义才可能把那些软弱、冷漠和自私的个人融合成一个强有力的整体“。。。。这一英雄必须把民族的利益置于所有其他的考虑之上,包括他自己的家人。。。)


Winds on the Plain shares much in common with other views that are inward-looking and reject the outside world apart from the economic benefits that can be reaped from a relationship with it. As Yuan remarks when putting the case against the West: 'Scientific rationalism has said all it can within the context of Western civilization'. (75)

(《荒原风》在很多方面和其他一些目光朝内、拒绝其联系可能给带来经济利益之外部世界的观点一致。正如袁在试图证明反西方有理的时候所说的那样“西方文明不过就是科学理性而已)

While couched in excessively purple prose, few of the views Yuan expresses in this book - one that was banned by the authorities for its 'bourgeois liberalism'! (76) - are particularly new, or Chinese. Nor are Yuan's views on male primacy (77) and racial strength unrelated to earlier trends among the priapic proponents of the avant-garde in the early 1980s. The well-known 'misty' poet Yang Lian's 'Nuoerlang' cycle of poems, although set in Tibet, gave voice to Han male dominance, and something of Yang's tone is reflected in the recent writings of another poet, Zhou Lunyou. Known as a dissenting writer since his advocacy of Not-Not ( feifei ) poetry in the mid-1980s, the Sichuan poet Zhou Lunyou was jailed following 1989 and after his release published an attack on post-Tiananmen cultural trends. (7Cool Lambasting the raffishness championed by Beijing writers like Wang Shuo, Zhou calls for 'red purity' ( hongse chucui ) in a tone of self-righteousness not that dissimilar to the tenor of Yuan Hongbing's work. Zhou came out in favour of a robust, 'muscular' poetry, pitting himself against all that was weak, effete and clannish in the Beijing and regional arts scene. (79)


(以上原文可以在http://www.tsquare.tv/themes/ToScrew.html处找到)

除此之外,以下一些西方学者论文或专著也都把袁红冰作为中国民族主义的典型例子加以分析-----

CONTEMPORARY CHINESE LITERATURE AND ART

Richard J. Smith Rice University (Draft; 12/20/97)

Culture," Race" and Nation: The Formation of National Identity in Twentieth Century China F Dikotter - Journal of International Affairs, 1996

The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan
F Dikötter - 1997 - University of Hawaii Pres


作者:安魂曲罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 安魂曲离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.112932 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]