海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 尊重洪哲胜先生将所有异见称为垃圾的权利和自由
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 尊重洪哲胜先生将所有异见称为垃圾的权利和自由   
所跟贴 尊重洪哲胜先生将所有异见称为垃圾的权利和自由 -- Anonymous - (1134 Byte) 2003-7-14 周一, 上午9:20 (277 reads)
姜茶
[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: 主权国家的要素和法理争议 (111 reads)      时间: 2003-7-14 周一, 下午5:19

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/State



“The legal criteria for statehood are generally accepted to be those set out in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention. "The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states." (The Montevideo is a regional American convention; but the principles contained in this article have been generally recognized as an accurate statement of customary international law.) However, some have questioned whether these criteria are sufficient.



A major issue is the difference between the constitutive and declarative theories of recognition of states. According to the constitutive theory, a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. The declarative theory, by contrast, holds that the existence of a state is independent of its recognition by other states. Which theory is correct is a controversial issue in international law. An example in practice was the collapse of central government in Somalia in the early 1990s: the Montevideo convention would imply that the state of Somalia no longer existed, and the subsequently declared republic of Somaliland (comprising part of the so-called "former" Somalia) may meet the criteria for statehood. However the self-declared republic has not achieved recognition by other states.”



从上述解释来看台湾当前的“独立”地位,在我看来,就算不谈政治现实,在法理上被人质疑完全正常。



第一,台湾有效控制的整块领土处于另一国主张的,并得到大多数国际法主体承认的领土范围之内。台湾对“领土”的实际控制不能消除该它国对其归属的主张,“拥有领土”和“控制领土”是可分的两个法律概念。如果主权国家四要素中要求的是“拥有明确领土”,则台湾有没有“拥有”“明确领土”是大可质疑的。



第二,台湾和其他国家交往的能力,无论如何都不能说是完全的,不论这个不完全是不是因为外在的原因。换句话说,台湾当前并不能自由的根据自己的意愿与任何国家建立外交关系,而不受另一国的影响。



此两点,加上主权国家是否需要他国承认的争议,大致界定了台湾当前的处境。





作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.077139 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]