|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 美国政府公布：未来的伊拉克全面受美国军事统治 |
 |
新闻
[博客]
[个人文集]
游客
|
|
|
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
美国政府公布：未来的伊拉克全面受美国军事统治
送交者: 赵里昱 于 Fri Feb 21 00:44:34 2003:
只有不到三十个伊拉克人会协助建立"真傀儡政府",
如果美国可以占领伊拉克的话。
怎么美国人那么奇怪，还没开战就说这种东西？
难道他们认为阿拉伯人吃硬不吃软？（中国人正好相反吧？）
TOP NEWS STORIES
? WP: Full U.S. control planned for Iraq
? U.S. troops to help hunt Abu Sayyaf
? ‘Many hurdles’after teen’s transplant
? Regan convicted of attempted spying
ALSO IN THE NEWS
? Sonics trade Payton to Bucks
? INS struggles to track foreign visitors
? Israeli troops crack down in Gaza
? HRT poses heart risks for diabetics
Gen. Tommy Franks, head of the U.S. Central Command, is to
maintain military control as long as U.S. troops are in Iraq.
Full U.S. control
planned for Iraq
United States to oversee rebuilding,
directed by American 憃f stature?
By Karen DeYoung and Peter Slevin
THE WASHINGTON POST
Feb. 21 ?The Bush administration plans to take
complete, unilateral control of a post-Saddam
Hussein Iraq, with an interim administration
headed by a yet-to-be named American civilian
who would direct the reconstruction of the
country and the creation of a 搑epresentative?
Iraqi government, according to a now-finalized
blueprint described by U.S. officials and other
sources.
?eDiets Diet Center
?Shop at B&N.com
?Auctions at uBid
?Yellow Pages
?Newsletters
?MSN Broadband
GEN. TOMMY FRANKS,
the head of the U.S. Central
Command, is to maintain military
control as long as U.S. troops are
there. Once security was established
and weapons of mass destruction
were located and disabled, a U.S.
administrator would run the civilian
government and direct
reconstruction and humanitarian aid.
In the early days of military
action, U.S. forces following behind
those in combat would distribute
food and other relief items and begin
needed reconstruction. The goal,
officials said, would be to make sure
the Iraqi people 搃mmediately?
consider themselves better off than
they were the day before war, and
attribute their improved
circumstances directly to the United
States.
The
initial
humanitarian
effort,
as
previously
announced,
is
to be directed by retired Army Lt.
Gen. Jay M. Garner. But once he
got to Baghdad, sources said,
Garner would quickly be replaced
as the supreme civil authority by an
American 搊f stature,?such as a
former U.S. state governor or
ambassador, officials said.
ROLE FOR U.N., OTHER
COUNTRIES
Officials said other
governments are being recruited to
participate in relief and
reconstruction tasks under U.S.
supervision at a time to be decided
by Franks and officials in
Washington. Although initial food
supplies are to be provided by the
United States, negotiations are
underway with the U.N. World
Food Program to administer a
nationwide distribution network.
Advertisement
Opposition leaders were
informed this week that the United
States will not recognize an Iraqi
provisional government being
discussed by some expatriate
groups. Some 20 to 25 Iraqis would
assist U.S. authorities in a
U.S.-appointed 揷onsultative
council,?with no governing
responsibility. Under a decision
finalized last week, Iraqi government
officials would be subjected to
揹e-Baathification,?a reference to
Hussein抯 ruling Baath Party, under
a program that borrows from the
揹e-Nazification?program
established in Germany after World
War II.
Criteria by which officials
would be designated as too tainted
to keep their jobs are still being
worked on, although they would
likely be based more on complicity
with the human rights and weapons
abuses of the Hussein government
than corruption, officials said. A
large number of current officials
would be retained.
REVISIONS ON THE RUN
慦e have a load of plans that could be carried out
by an international group, a coalition group, or by us
and a few others.?
?SENIOR U.S. OFFICIAL
Although some of the broad
strokes of U.S. plans for a
post-Hussein Iraq have previously
been reported, newly finalized
elements include the extent of U.S.
control and the plan to appoint a
nonmilitary civil administrator.
Officials cautioned that
developments in Iraq could lead
them to revise the plan on the run.
Yet to be decided is 揳t what point
and for what purpose?a
multinational administration, perhaps
run by the United Nations, would be
considered to replace the U.S. civil
authority.
揥e have a load of plans that
could be carried out by an
international group, a coalition
group, or by us and a few others,?
said one senior U.S. official.
President Bush, the official said,
doesn抰 want to close options until
the participants in a military action
are known and the actual postwar
situation in Iraq becomes clear.
The administration has been
under strong pressure to
demonstrate that it has a detailed
program to deal with what is
expected to be a chaotic and
dangerous situation if Hussein is
removed. The White House plans to
brief Congress and reporters on
more details of the plan next week.
No definitive price tag or time
limit has been put on the plan, and
officials stressed that much remains
unknown about the length of a
potential conflict, how much
destruction would result, and 揾ow
deep?the corruption of the Iraqi
government goes. The
administration has declined to
estimate how long U.S. forces
would remain in Iraq.
Undersecretary of State Marc
Grossman told Congress last week
that it might be two years before the
Iraqis regained administrative
control of their country. But 搕hey抮e
terrified of being caught in a time
frame,?said retired Army Gen.
Barry R. McCaffrey, one of a
number of senior military and civilian
experts who have been briefed by
the Pentagon on the plan. 揗y own
view is that it will take five years,
with substantial military power, to
establish and exploit the peace?in
Iraq.
OFFICIALLY, NO DECISION
YET
Although more than 180,000
U.S. troops are on the ground in the
Persian Gulf region, U.S. officials
continued to emphasize that
President Bush still has not made a
final decision on whether to go to
war. Negotiations at the United
Nations, where Bush is seeking a
new Security Council resolution
declaring that Hussein has violated
U.N. disarmament demands and
authorizing that he be disarmed by a
U.N. multinational force, are at a
delicate stage.
A majority of the council抯 15
members have said they believe a
decision on war should be delayed
while U.N. weapons inspections,
launched in November, continue.
Bush has said that, if necessary, the
U.S. military and a 揷oalition of the
willing?will disarm Iraq without
U.N. approval.
The administration also is
continuing discussions with Arab
governments about the possibilities
of exile for Hussein and several
dozen of his family members and
top officials. Sources said, however,
that even if Hussein and a small
group of others were to leave,
uncertainties about who would
remain in charge, the need to
destroy weapons of mass
destruction, and concerns about
establishing long-term stability
would likely lead to the insertion of
U.S. troops there in any case.
PARSING THE PLAN
Among the other parts of the
post-Hussein plan:
Iraqi military forces would be
gathered in prisoner-of-war camps,
with opposition members now
receiving U.S. training at an air base
in Hungary serving as part of the
guard force. The Iraqi troops would
be vetted by U.S. forces under
Franks抯 command, and those who
were cleared, beginning with those
who 搒tood down or switched
sides?during a U.S. assault, would
receive U.S. training to serve in
what one official called a
損ost-stabilization?force.
U.S. forces would secure any
weapons of mass destruction that
were found, including biological and
chemical weapons stores. 揂t an
appropriate time,?an official said,
the United Nations Monitoring,
Verification and Inspection
Commission and the International
Atomic Energy Agency, who are
conducting U.N.-mandated
weapons inspections in Iraq, might
be brought in to examine weaponry,
scientists and documentation.
In addition to the consultative
council, an Iraqi commission would
be formed to reestablish a judicial
system. An additional commission
would write a new constitution,
although officials emphasized that
they would not expect to
揹emocratize?Iraq along the lines
of the U.S. governing system.
Instead, they speak of a
搑epresentative Iraqi government.?
LESSONS LEARNED
The Bush administration is particularly keen on
averting interference by regional powers.
Officials said the decision to
install U.S. military and civilian
administrations for an indeterminate
time stems from lessons learned in
Afghanistan, where power has been
diffused among U.S. military forces
still waging war against the remnants
of the Taliban and al Qaeda, a
multinational security force of
several thousand troops in which the
United States does not participate,
and the interim government of
Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
The administration is
particularly keen on averting
interference by other regional
powers, and cites the 揳bility of
people like the Iranians and others
to go in with money and create
warlords?sympathetic to their own
interests, one official said. 揥e
don抰 want a weak federal
government that plays into the hands
of regional powers?and allows Iraq
to be divided into de facto spheres
of influence. 揥e don抰 want the
Iranians to be paying the Shiites, the
Turks the Turkmen, and the Saudis
the Sunnis,?the official, referring to
some of the main groups among
dozens of Iraqi tribes and ethnic and
religious groups.
A similar anxiety led to the
decision to prohibit the Iraqi
opposition based outside the
country from forming a provisional
government. The chief proponent of
that idea, Ahmed Chalabi, head of
the Iraqi National Congress, was
informed this week that any move to
declare a provisional Iraqi
government 搘ould result in a
formal break in the U.S.-INC
relationship,?the official said.
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
