|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 |
 |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31803
经验值: 519161
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
"相对勾股定理", the greatest invention made by 随便
芦笛
I suggest you turn to your speciality and accuse me of revealing women's sexual privacy, instead of waging into an intellectual debate, which is far beyond your dim intelligence, OK?
Where is the evidence for my "人身攻击"? I did call you "idiot", but that was a factual statement, because you had demonstrated that you failed to understand the gist of a simplest article.
Worse still, after I had pointed out your idiocy, instead of admitting your mistakes, you went to your old track, ie, twisting logic and thus invented more jokes.
Look at the joke you made up: "特例有相对性"!
If I say "Sunbian is an idiot", I am talking about a particular case. Where is its “relativity”? Can we generalize this statement to other “Suibians”?
This is nothing compared with your "相对勾股定理" . Can you please tell us what on earth it is? From which book have you learned this "相对勾股定理"? Did "zhou pi suan jing", the first record of "勾三股四弦五", or any Chinese ancient math books, say that this statement could be generalized so as to give the following formula:
(3k)2+(4k)2=(5k)2?
Let me tell you, son, once again, you proved unable to comprehend my articles. I have pointed out in that piece that the critical weak point of the ancient Chinese mathematicians is that they never learned to think in an abstractive way and thus generalize particular cases into a universal theorem. So they never invented algebra (dai shu) and never learned to use a symbol (like the letter “k” you used) to represent all the numbers. Now you are inventing this "相对勾股定理", trying to cover up your stupid mistake, only to expose other idiocies. Ha! Ha!
Not only this. You are a shameless liar too. You said:
“俺不会证明。不过数学家说这个是经过证明的，俺相信就是了”.
Whoever has said the ancient Chinese mathematicians had ever proven “勾股定理” (or your “相对勾股定理” for that matter)? Please present evidence. You claimed more than once that you were the most honest person online that spoke only on the basis of facts. Now look what your “facts” are: “相对勾股定理” and its proof!
As for “敬老原则”and “这次俺先饶你 一次，下不为例”, please cut the crap and stop disgusting me. I had promised you before the order of segregation was issued that I would squeeze you to death with my iron-like facts and logic. I will realize this promise. Everyone has witnessed how you “敬老” and “饶” me. Do not use these words to cover up the fact that even though you racked up your poor brain, you were always beaten due to your inferior intelligence. The readers are neither blind nor idiotic as you may imagine.
I must go back to work. Nice talking to you. If you have no guts to admit mistakes, I strongly suggest you shut up. If you cannot even do that, you will end up losing more face. That much I can solemnly promise you. It will be dead easy to squeeze you to death, even if I have to use English.
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
