|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 To Ms 老百姓 |
 |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31803
经验值: 519161
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
Sorry for the late response because I had not read your comments until just a moment ago. You might not know that 东海一枭 was my friend (or still is, I am not sure). Since I left a cross comment following his nonsense, I have been concerned, not sure how he would take it. That was why I went to his wenji to see his response a moment ago. To my relief, he did not overreact. But very unfortunately, I read your bullshit.
(Would please banzhu notice that “bullshit” is not equivalent to “shit”, and I am not violating the rules here)
Dear Madam, do you know what your problem is? It is pretty simple: you are under the delusion that you are intellectually qualified to argue in a political forum, because you think you are some kind of “scholar”. Unfortunately, you do not know (or refuse) to accept the following facts:
1) In general, the Chinese is a stupid nation.
2) With few exceptions, the intelligence of the Chinese “scholars” is lower than average. It would be pretty safe to take them for born buffoons or morons.
3) With even fewer exceptions, the Chinese “scholars” specializing in social sciences, literature, history, philosophy, etc (wen ke xue zhe) are the most stupid subhuman species. It would be even safer to take them for super-idiots, lower than monkey on the evolution ladder.
Obviously, you belong to the third category. Therefore, it is the worst nightmare a smart guy like me could possibly experience to have “intellectual intercourses” with a super idiot like you. Whether you realize it or not, you and your likes have become the most formidable nuisance on the internet that has eventually prompted me to give up serious writing altogether.
Now let’s have a look at your bullshit to see how stupid you are, shall we?
“东海一枭的“击芦笛一掌，为胡平一辨”是网上难得的理性的文章。观点是一回事，如何表达观点深化讨论不仅仅是方法问题，它与与人交往的态度和心态有关（但有多大的相关性还有待于相关的实证研究）。”
This paragraph only reveals that you do not have the minimal intellectual capacity to comprehend and appreciate articles. 东海一枭 is (or was, it’s up to him, not me) my friend and I do like some (not all) of his poetry, but I have the lowest opinion on his political essays, even though I wrote the preface for his book. His way of thinking (if any) has nothing to do with 理性, only to show off his smartness and self-righteousness. It is always like that. You read one, then you read them all. Any reader with a decent brain can tell you that.
The reason why I was cross with 东海一枭 was that my criticisms on Hu Ping had triggered a political campaign during which those “demon-crats” launched the “Online Red Terror” to “suppress counterrevolutionaries”. As a result, I had become a victim and had been labeled a “CCP spy”. It was no longer “观点讨论” but had become political persecution. Yet, being a friend of mine, 东海一枭 was eager to “击芦笛一掌，为胡平一辨”, only to show off his firm political stand. That really made me sick. But of course, you would not understand this, otherwise you would not be such a self-righteous super-idiot.
“在一个理性社会，再好的观点或再漂亮的文采如果不考虑表达方式，在这种意义上后者有时起决定作用。而所谓表达方式即对持异议观点的一方的人格的尊重，无论他或她的知识水准、政治立场、社会地位、经济状况、抑或自然条件等等都与讨论的观点本身无关。通俗的说即“对事不对人”，如果上述胡平的文章的落款是杨小楷，芦笛是否也要跟这样的贴？芦笛不同意胡平的什么观点或请撰文讲来，有兴趣者参可与问题的讨论，而不涉及对人的褒贬。”
See how idiotic you really are! Are you saying that we can treat Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Hu Jintao the same way we treat an ordinary citizen? Equally “对事不对人”?
If we cannot equalize them to ordinary citizens , why should 胡平 be treated differently?
FREEDOM OF SPEECH ONLY APPLIES TO ORDINARY CITIZENS. Any politician, no matter what political force he represents, should watch his mouth or face the consequences. That’s the message I tried to convey in three pieces. Here is just one of them.
http://www.hjclub.com/Showtopic.asp?ID=540004
Still, you are telling me “芦笛不同意胡平的什么观点或请撰文讲来”! Do you understand Chinese at all? Or such a simple message is too difficult for you to comprehend, you superb buffoon?
“如果上述胡平的文章的落款是杨小楷，芦笛是否也要跟这样的贴？”
First, it’s not “杨小楷”, you illiterate. Go back to your elementary school and finish what you have left there.
Second, 杨 would never have written such a stupid “article”. For one thing, had he been as stupid as 胡平 is, I would not have held great respect for him. For another, he never wanted to become the new ruler of Chinese slaves as 胡平 does. Finally, he would never have labeled those who did not obey him “running dogs”(nu cai) as 胡平 did.
Finally, even if 杨 had lost all his senses and had written that stupid “article”, which is totally impossible, I would not have given a damn BECAUSE HE WAS NOT A POLITICIAN AS 胡平 IS!
Do you understand, you super moron?
“在一个理性社会，再好的观点或再漂亮的文采如果不考虑表达方式就没有市场，干脆进不了市场。芦笛说他是千面人－－跟洋人不得不用洋人的方式交往，而在这坛子里惟有拼命厮杀才能生存。胡平此文并没有影响你在坛子里的生存权，您这个不容人的跟贴倒是有碍于他人在此坛子里生存.”
Is that so? What about me being labeled a CCP spy? Please click this link and see how this vivid exhibition of Red Terror is so beneficial to my “坛子里的生存权”, will you?
http://www.hjclub.com/Showtopic.asp?ID=541008
Like all super idiots, you are obsessed with your superficial sense of “justice” or “righteousness” (zhengyi gan), which is all that you have and is what you take for “intelligence”. Now here is the best opportunity for you to show us your sense of “justice”. Go and condemn those really “有碍于他人在此坛子里生存,不容人的贴”, please.
Pity you live in the UK and yet still have no idea whatsoever about the best lesson the English people learned from their Civil War, that is, if the majority of the people are full of sense of “righteousness”, then the country is bound to be doomed. Basically, my motivation to write on line is to dilute this superficial sense of righteousness that grips most of the Chinese people. But of course, this is too much for your dim “intelligence”.
“在一个理性社会，再好的观点或再漂亮的文采如果不考虑表达方式就没有市场，干脆进不了市场。芦笛说他是千面人－－跟洋人不得不用洋人的方式交往，而在这坛子里惟有拼命厮杀才能生存。”
I do not give a damn if my works “干脆进不了市场”. The reasons why I “拼命厮杀” are not only that I want to 生存, but also that there are so many obsessed self-righteous super-idiots like you. I have told readers many, many times that by nature, I am an intellectual snob, lacking intellectual tolerance. To me, a moron is already unbearable. If that moron is also self-righteous, then I will definitely have an outburst just like now.
Madam, I hope this piece will serve you right and I do hope it will be good enough to be the reward for your persistent unilateral interest in my writings. Now you can go and join “the Holy Anti-Lu League of Abused Women”. I wish you good luck!
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
- 老舅, 新年好. -- 然然 - (43 Byte) 2005-1-01 周六, 下午11:05 (232 reads)
- Thank you, -- 芦笛 - (87 Byte) 2005-1-01 周六, 下午11:17 (202 reads)
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
