阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
作者 |
随便 |
 |
芦笛 [博客] [个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14 文章: 31805
经验值: 519217
|
|
|
作者:芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
1) Yesterday I asked you:
“Are you accusing the Party of defending its right to eat sheep to such a degree that it will never hesitate to kill 30 million Chinese people? “
You answered:
“大跃进是犯吃羊过多的错误。”
Then I said:
“I am not talking about Great Leap Forward. I am talking about your warning that the wolf will eat 30 million Chinese people alive, only for them to retain the right to eat sheep.”
Then you said:
“俺没说过这话,谁说的你找谁去。”
OK, so Jiaren has lied. Funny enough, before you denied this, you had just said in the headline:
“俺只问了一下民主人士准备掉几个脑袋。狼羊论的要点则是羊需要狼来吃”
So if you did not say it, whoever did?
Furthermore, being a clever guy, how could you mistake my question as if I was talking about the Great Famine?
The only explanation for this strange phenomenon is that in the depth of your heart, you firmly believe that 30 million people perished during the Great Famine. Thus, the figure of “30 million” would induce an automatic reaction from you, and you would immediately think the other was talking about the Great Famine.
Is this explanation correct? If not, please point out where and how I went wrong. Thank you!
The most convincing evidence for this interpretation is that you did not even bother to deny the figure first. Rather, you admitted that the famine was a mistake committed by the “wolf”.
Moreover, when I was trying to confirm my interpretation :
“But this is good. It means that you agree that 30 million Chinese people perished during the Great Famine.”
You never tried to refute me, didn’t you?
2) Then I wrote:
“Pity you could not even sort yourself out. I thought Great Leap Forward was a crime due to stupidity, and now you are telling everyone it was a deliberate murder! “
To this you answered:
“吃得太过,也可以是无心之失么。俺看您有时候也
显得吃饱了撑的。”
Excuse me, your royal highness, but are you saying that “eating sheep” could be unintended actions? No idiot of this world would think so. So how should we comprehend your “theory”?
Are you saying that the original plan of the Party was to starve fewer people to death, but somehow they lost the control and “吃得太过”, so more people were killed than the Party had planned?
Again, is my interpretation correct? Except for this, I cannot think of any other way to comprehend your sophisticated “theory”.
3) I also asked:
“So far so good. But sir, if you to not mind my asking, why do you have to condemn American social system and democracy in general and praise dictatorship? All the rulers are after all wolves, aren't they? Or are you saying that the Commie wolves eat sheep more efficiently?”
You answered:
“一般对美国,俺只指出,他们跟中国统治者一样,也是狼。
因为这一点认清的人不多,因此俺说的多一些。”
Really? You really mean the American and Chinese rulers are equally bad? Sorry, but I do not remember you have ever said these words before. Instead, you said many times that democracy was an evil invention aimed to destroy societies, etc, etc, and dictatorship was something really great, etc, etc. Also you spent every ounce of your energy in praising the Chinese government, even to such a disgusting degree of calling the current times “tang2 yu2 sheng4 shi4”.
I must point out I read all these words from the headlines of your posters, not from the texts, but if the headlines were so disgusting, what else one could expect from the texts?
Do you want me to present evidence, sir?
4) Then I asked you:
“As for the 4th and 5th points, you forgot to define territories for the wolve. As everyone knows, if there is something that is constantly changing, that is the border lines. How could forgeign wolves from Northeast conqure the whole China and eat sheep for almost 3 hundred years? Can you explain that fact with your theory, please? Besides, if Tibet and Xinjiang tell Beijing ‘狼都有地盘,越界吃羊不行’, what would you say? “
Your answer was:
“狼和其他猛兽一样都有边界。当然边界也是变动的,但是
相对固定是有的。国界也是一样的。”
Jolly good! As far as I know, the border between Taiwan and China has been 相对固定 for more than half a century by now. According to your theory "狼都有地盘,越界吃羊不行", all of us should be against any attempt made by the CCP to 越界吃羊, is that right?
5) Finally, I would like to repeat yesterday’s question:
“Mr 随便, why did you have to re-educate people by telling them the cruel truth? Why did you have to sabotage our great Party by inciting massive hatred most actively along with those ‘min yun’ trashes?”
Your royal highness, can you please answer the above 5 questions? Many thanks!
作者:芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题 您不能在本论坛回复主题 您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章 您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章 您不能在本论坛发表投票 您不能在这个论坛添加附件 您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|