消极
[个人文集]
加入时间: 2004/02/15
文章: 9097
经验值: 14803
|
|
|
作者：消极 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
The title attracts alot eyeballs. I wrote a long one, and lost it, damn it.
Be honest, I would be more ethusiastic about these topics if you don't use brawls as example. I know my two cents worth nothing.
Without knowing those trivials, one can't figure out what you're talking about logic; and knowing them causes anyone with a sound mind losing appetite, partly because of your sour-mouth style. The reconciliation lies in your hand. Examples are everywhere, one obvious is editorial of People's Daily.
My observation about common logic erroes and fallacies on chinese website are: causation related erroes, and Tu quoque. The typical causation related erroes are: mis-placing necessary/sufficient as causation(no ccp no new china); mis-placing correlation of causation, and etc. The second type: the graphical representation is Mr Q(a Q).
Could you please give these term, like 排中律, in english? It's confusing somehow.
作者：消极 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
海外中文网上常见病态思维解剖系列（二）
