|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 误会比子弹更有杀伤力 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
误会比子弹更有杀伤力 -- dck - (87 Byte) 2007-4-22 周日, 下午5:21 (300 reads) |
dck
加入时间: 2004/04/02
文章: 2801
经验值: 4649
|
|
|
作者：dck 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
转贴者评论：
中文概括的到点。英文忒罗嗦。
同意你，那个黑人诗人老师确实不地道。师生可能有personality conflict, 但，为人师者，要有风范，不是跟你老公使性子。
教授是拿着学生的学费来上课的。把小赵踢出课堂，过份了。
可惜，这个黑女人不懂。还成天在电视上抛头露面。
看花眼了。最后一句，说人家美国不理解东方文化，真是莫明其妙。 概括成文化冲突了。败笔啊。
悲剧赵承熙
(李良书简二零零七年四月二十一日之三)
喜剧让你日子好过, 悲剧给你力量.
悲剧的意义, 不在宣扬道德, 明示教条, 以建立人类行为的准则.
好的悲剧, 是没有道德字眼的, 只是默然地运用精致而周到的词句, 铺陈事件, 从各种可能的角度去描绘人类之间负面活动的进行.将施者和受者平等地放在解剥平台上, 把丑陋, 恶毒, 残酷, 怨恨, 偏见, 无情, 贪吝, 傲慢, 痴迷, 失落, 悲戚, 懦弱,愚味等等, 堆切贯串起来的混屯一团, 一刀一锯地, 仔细的在你眼前将它们暴露出来.
於是你心神震撼, 良知顿开. 不禁将自己也放在同一个解剥平台上, 作自我的剥解. 终究也看到自己的丑陋, 恶毒, 残酷, 怨恨, 偏见,无情, 贪吝, 傲慢, 痴迷, 失落, 悲戚, 懦弱, 愚味等等. 於是不自觉地, 你就会感受着解脱, 生出和平, 涌起同情, 憧憬真爱;於是你灵魂不自觉地得到了净化, 一时奄奄欲死的身心, 就有了再生的契机. 如果你看莎士比亚之後能到达此处, 那我就向你说声恭喜!
赵承熙从八岁起, 经历长长的十五年岁月, 身不由主地跟他周遭的人们一同编写演出了一部以他为主角的悲剧, 可以跟莎士比亚的哈梦雷特前後辉映.他的这部悲剧, 在他二十三岁的一个西风初起, 万物生长的四月里落幕. 我作为他的一个年长的读者, 泪眼朦胧之馀, 不免要追问自己,我究竟从他那儿得到了什麽力量?
赵承熙在这部悲剧里, 直到他枪口喷火的前一霎那间, 都担纲着一个无辜的角色. 长长的十五年里, 他的存在, 只是人间种种的丑陋, 恶毒,残酷, 怨恨, 偏见, 无情, 贪吝, 傲慢, 痴迷, 懦弱, 愚味等等的一个载具, 一个在长时间狂风暴雨敲击之下, 纸糊竹札的棚屋.那不可承受之重, 终而将他压得粉碎; 他的灵魂无处可归, 致而不得不被魔鬼召引.
四月十六日之後, 人们为他搜罗跟编排的许多故事是可笑的, 有的简直到了违反常识欲加之罪的地步. 我在 “Cho Seung-Hui, amuch ignored victim – A modern tragedy of Shakespearean scale waswritten” 一文里已道出了许多, 还有些未尽的, 就稍为在这说说. 至於当下媒体间浮出来的, 那些从来不为寻求真相的无数公众评诋,就不必提了.
譬如他被校方以骚扰罪名送到精神病院, 原因只是他曾给所慕的女同学打了些电话和送上电邮. 天啊! 这也算是是罪名吗? 如果是,那今天所有好逑的君子都劫数难逃, 这世上的精神病院能容得下吗? 赵承熙的人格早已被人谋杀, 小女孩被渲染所误, 脑子里一时解不开,还情有可愿. 身为成人的, 连这些常识都没有了吗? 这些莫须有的精神病院案底, 赵承熙即使不死, 一生的事业不都毁了吗?更不要说他身心受到的折辱感受了.
最最丑陋, 恶毒, 残酷, 傲慢, 偏见, 无情的. 就是赵承熙的两位英文老师. 这两个不学无术的女人, 无慈悲之心, 无宽容之意,只因为他一些不合己意的举止, 无限上纲, 加减事实, 选类而教, 无理将他逐出课堂. 不但看不出他写作上的天分,更体会不出一个久受折辱的脆弱灵魂的呐喊; 还扭曲了他剧本的原意, 捏造理由以误导外界, 杀人於无形之中.赵承熙自懂事以来已无辜地为人折磨一生, 最後落在这两个女巫手里, 赶尽杀绝, 终於成为祭品.
赵承熙君, 你的家境不好, 沉默寡言, 不会交际, 不能从俗, 绝不是罪过. 至少, 你姊姊的泣血诉言：
“這是个跟我一同长大为我所爱的人, 可我现下却觉得如此的陌生. 我们向来都是亲密, 和平, 而有爱的一家; 我的弟弟从来都是沉默与退让, 却无时不挣扎着去合群. 我们一辈子都想不通他为何能够做出这麽暴戾的事!
(This is someone that I grew up with and loved. Now I feel like Ididn’t know this person. We have always been a close, peaceful andloving family. My brother was quiet and reserved, yet struggled to fitin. We never could have envisioned that he was capable of so muchviolence.)”
已道尽一切! 你就跟你枪下的所有无辜者, 一起灵魂安息吧!
Cho Seung-Hui, a much ignored victim – A modern tragedy of Shakespearean scale was written
Leeliang Letters, April 18, 2007
The bloody scene staged by a young Korean immigrant and student, ChoSeung-Hui, in the Virginia Tech campus on the day of April 16 hadalmost brought the United States into a halt. While in grief, we alsofound ourselves in dismay, disbelief, some of us feel outright angry,most of us unsettled with our conscience, and can’t help but wrestlewith our souls to seek answers to this absolute question, why? And, weall but ask, is there a salvation out of this carnage?
As an immigrant of Chinese origin myself thirty eight years ago, I haveraised and nourished three children born in this country and haveobserved their successful integrations into this society. I thinkconfidently that I may be able to provide some answers through my owndealing with the character building issues in child education. I hopemy confession and analysis herein could provide a way to lessen thepossibility of the recurrence of this type of tragedy if not completelycurtail.
First of all, Cho’s act was totally out of place; his killing ofinnocent bystanders to vent personal frustration shall not be toleratedby all moral standards. Yet I think this tragedy could have beenavoided if we were more open-minded in dealing with Cho's wounded soul.
The answer can be found in those after-fact criticisms towards him, 1)his “loner” mentality, 2) his demeanor of daily life, and 3) his way ofexpressing himself in his creative writings. I think all these threeare unrelated to the motive of Cho’s killing rampage. Just the oppositeof those unfound public outcries, it is the kind of psychology thatcaused the presence of these three elements led to Cho’s cruel andsenseless mass slaughters.
Cho came to this country at the age of eight, a critical period ofbuilding up his attitude and cognition of a society he was going to beset in for the rest of his life. Apparently, his parent were busy inoperating their laundry business and had the least of time for the careof their only son while they themselves were also in a state ofintegrating and adapting after leaving their mother country, Korea.Cho’s body language as a loner might have started to take form sincethe first day he stepped into an elementary school class (in the thirdgrade?) in an environment utterly not to his familiarity and comfort.Shy inside and language limited in the outside as most of the newlyimmigrated kids have experienced, timidity and scare of the unknownshould have prevented him in making eye-contacts with strangers, andhis speaking deficiency would have prevent him from being an activeparticipator in casual conversations. Most of similar immigrant kidswould have shrunk into spheres of isolation of their own but thatdoesn’t mean they are anti-social and are not aware of what is going onin the outside world. It is during this critical age that without thefamily’s attention and the lack of proper consulting from the school,the image of Cho the loner was therefore established and unless hecould enlighten himself through his own efforts in his later years, Chothe loner would stay throughout his life-span. However, Cho the lonershould not be necessary nor sufficient leading to Cho the killer! Thereare millions of Cho the loner out in this world.
As Cho grew up into his adolescence he should have all the desires asany energetic and vibrant young man would have. Among these commonhuman desires the love of a female and gaining respect were two. Butwith his character as a loner, shy and lack of the necessary socialskills as those of many affluence and well-horned school mates, Cho wasforced to retreat to his own cocoon of escape, feeling threatened andpressured. It was only in there he could find his last content. Yetthis was a state of extremely unstable equilibrium, a tiny disturbancewould have ticked him off emotionally and rendered him into reflexiveactions before he could have reasonably thought through and sorted out.When conventional acts of exchanges were not possible, off-trackbehaviors would have emerged. This explains Cho’s peculiar (tooutsiders) demeanors as a grown-up as seen in his daily encounteringwith other people (as so widely said and advocated in the publicdomains after the tragedy). But still, Cho the man of undesireddemeanor should not be the necessary and sufficient precursor leadingto Cho the killer. There are again millions of Cho the men of undesireddemeanor in the real world.
From what I read, Cho was quite a creative writer and was no differentto any other writers who are writing events of drama. The two shortplays he wrote showed an explicit trait of mimicking Shakespeare’sHamlet, the classic play of revenge. Contents of Chos’s play writingswere not even close to the violence as Clint Eastwood’s old movieswould have suggested, notwithstanding the video games millions of youngfolks are playing every day, or the bombing and gunning down theIraqis. There is no reason we should believe that he had writtenanything improper in the literature sense, much less malicious. Asyoung and inexperienced as he was, it is understood that he wrote farless graceful and elegant as what Shakespeare did. Nevertheless, hisexpression is creative in the sense of attempting to portrait an act ofhuman revenge using the kind of street language he was familiar with,for example using chainsaw and hammer instead of sword and poison. Chothe creative writer was as innocent as Shakespeare the creative writerwas, there is no necessary and sufficient evidence in his two shortplays that should draw a conclusion of Cho the killer.
Yet Cho the killer did exist and I can tell you why now out of my observations.
Rather than with understanding and being patient as a teacher shouldbe, Cho’s English creative writing teacher, Nikki Giovanni kicked himout of the class simply because she didn’t like his wearing of sunglass and hat in the class. She even considered the quiet andless-spoken Cho a security threat in the class. But you know these dayshow the average college kids treat their dress codes that there aremuch more bizarre clothing’s than Cho’s all over the classrooms in thecountry. This shall not be the ground for expelling. Giovanni simplydespised Cho because of her personal taste to the extent that she hadthreatened to resign if Cho was not taken out of her class. I saw muchmore hatred and bigotry from the side of Nikki Giovanni than fromCho’s. This is no way of education. As an African American, Ms.Giovanni is a notorious activist of promoting “Black Power” but Ireally wish that she were not into an alternative form of racism bytaking the young Korean-origin Cho discriminatory.
Adding insult to injury, the case was further handled erroneously bythe former chairwoman of Virginia Tech's English department, LucindaRoy. Instead of resolving the predicament with caution and reason, Ms.Roy chose to take side with Giovanni’s irrational request and bulliedCho once more. Ms. Roy succumbed to Giovanni’s demands and dealt withCho on a one-on-one basis but yet she could not see though the clouds;she despised him as well. This English Professor of Virginia Techtwisted and distorted Cho’s original motive of writing, foolishlyreported to the school’s disciplinary branch and to the law enforcementofficials that Cho had mental illness. For the proud and insecure Cho,it would be a deadly blow to his self-esteem. It certainly was nothelping his already wounded ego. In Roy’s mind, Cho was not a studentand the creative writer but Cho the criminal. She implicated furtherafter the April 16 tragedy that Cho was actually on the road of being amass murderer; she exaggerated and told with a biased attitude tojustify her prejudice. I am at awed of her total ignorance in playslike Hamlet or the scale of Clint Eastwood series movies of dirty Harryas an English Professor. I am ashamed of her insufficiency as aqualified writer. Her ineptness had eventually and fatally driven Chointo further misery and into an emotional hell, a road of no return;she put him in a mental institute for examination through coordinatingwith the law enforcement. I don’t think a young and self-inhibitive Chocould take this any further except erupting into a total lost state,engulfed with extreme angers and longing for revenges as whatShakespeare had made Hamlet to be. Cho’s classmates weren’t that benigneither, they ridiculed his writings, and took what Cho’s imaginarywriting as his own deeds that he should have carried out to show hiscommitment.
It was both of Nikki Giovanni and Lucinda Roy’s biased judgments andtheir mistaken actions regarding the young Cho that had sent him intothe abyss. Cho’s final word “You made me do it” tells it all. It isthese outrageous and irresponsible English teachers and Cho’s mindlessclassmates who had transformed him into a killing monster.
In this tragedy 33 precious human lives have disappeared violently.Unlike what I have been told by the media, I see three parties who areresponsible to this carnage, namely, the actually very gifted Chohimself, his classmates, and most importantly, his one-time Englishteachers Nikki Giovanni and Lucinda Roy. And among those of 33 killed,Cho Seung-Hui was the much ignored victim; a victim of himself, hisclassmates, and his teachers. As a very gifted young man, he shouldhave used his pen rather than his guns to search for justice and tofree his soul. His wanton slaughtering of innocents is especiallyinexcusable.
A modern tragedy of Shakespearean scale was written. Above all, Ms.Nikki Giovanni and Ms. Lucinda Roy of Virginia Tech should both resignpermanently as teachers and educators because they are essentially not.They are not only inferior in their literature understandings but areruthless human beings as well. I shall also condemn the media sincethey are doing nothing to make this tragedy a worthy lesson but in afrenzy of collecting and making up evidences to rationalize theirconcatenation of Cho’s evil intent of being a mass murderer in order toappease the ignorant. America still has a long way to truly and fullyunderstand oriental culture!
作者：dck 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
