阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
作者 |
九.一一事件讨论参考资料 |
 |
所跟贴 |
According to the video -- bystander - (646 Byte) 2006-9-19 周二, 上午5:08 (128 reads) |
淞岛
加入时间: 2006/06/24 文章: 297
经验值: 52
|
|
|
WTC’s collapse, partly thanks to economics like you.
Due to economics consideration, the civil buildings are not as strong as military buildings. When they designed WTC, I doubt real strength of the building as the designer clams... It is impossible to test.
As to the collapse speed, NIST has backed down from the initial pancake theory to a more realistic collapse mode including the cone.
|
|
|
返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题 您不能在本论坛回复主题 您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章 您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章 您不能在本论坛发表投票 您不能在这个论坛添加附件 您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|