海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: “疗愚篇”之二
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 “疗愚篇”之二   
所跟贴 “疗愚篇”之二 -- 芦笛 - (15690 Byte) 2003-3-23 周日, 上午4:18 (976 reads)
然然
[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: 现看现卖,给你提供点材料。:)) (255 reads)      时间: 2003-3-23 周日, 上午4:48

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

03/21 WALL STREET JOURNAL的文章<< President's Dream: Changing Not Just Regime but a Region>>. by Robert Greenberger and Karby Leggett



我找了一下,网上没有全文。我认为非常有价值的文章。作者认为此战意在中东建立一个亲美的政权,使沙特,埃及和伊拉克成为美国的夥伴,并且打击地区极端势力,促进巴以问题的解决。



"The story of how Mr. Bush came to embrace the vision began with a family quarrels among Republicans. It picked up strength in the late-1990s with the failure of the Oslo peach accords between Isreal and Palestinian, which strenghened harwks in Isreal and Washington who were advocating more muscular policies toward Arabs. And finally it emerged as a centerpiece of American policy with a president looking for a new theory of the region after it gave rise to the most deadly attack ever on American soil.



One of the places the idea was born was the Project fro the New American Century, which was a fledgling and unnoticed neoconservative thin tank in 1998. That is when it told Mr. Clinton the time had come to depose Saddam.



In a letter to Mr. Clinton put together by the group's director , former intelligence offical Gary Schimtt, the group declared :" The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possiblity that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use wapons of mass desctrcution. In the near term it means a willingness to undertake military action...in the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power."



....It managed to get its message signed by 18 national security harwks. Many of them focused on Irqq because they viewed Mr. Hussien as a disruptive force , who , with a record of invading his neighbours, intimaidated moderate forces in the region. They also saw his continued rule as epitomizing all theat was wrong with the Clintion administoration's foreign policy: a lack of clear purpose, a willingness to act based on politically expediency rather than moral principles, and an unwillingness to use sufficient military power to bend Mr. Hussein to American will.



不行。回家吃饭了。回来再把后面的抄上来。我觉得很不错。 very informative. ...



有很多打错的地方。你凑合看吧。

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 1.801959 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]